Cybercrime Enforcement: ASEAN’s New Industrial Policy? 1


Southeast Asian states are stepping up their prosecution of cybercrime and illicit online activities. A September UNCTAD report showed that 8 out of 10 ASEAN countries have cybercrime legislation exceeding international standards, and on September 19th, ASEAN declared the creation of a new cybercrime working group. ASEAN nations are also trumpeting enforcement of these laws, as evidenced by the highly publicized arrest of 35 cybercriminals in the Philippines last month.

This makes a lot of sense. Today, Southeast Asian economies, especially those without substantive industrial sectors, are increasingly trying to drive economic growth through research and development. Singapore, for example, explicitly encourages biotech firms to relocate within its borders, citing “world class intellectual property protection” and it’s growth as a “regional research and development hub.” In addition to such domestic efforts, many regional economies are pursuing trans-national agreements on Intellectual Property Law, most notably those to be contained in the upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The hope, presumably, is that protecting research-based companies will draw yet more research and development spending to the country, fueling a sustainable, development driven growth strategy.

Perhaps cracking down on cyber crime is a logical extension of these initiatives: countries need to increase their ability to find and prosecute cyber criminals to show their resolve in protecting the trade secrets of their research driven industries. R&D driven businesses would be hesitant to relocate to a country with high rates of cybercrime, or little cybercrime enforcement, because it would make it easy for them to have their intellectual property illegally taken, regardless of the Intellectual Property law of the country. ASEAN, at least, is clearly aware of this: the most recent ASEAN roundtable – a forum for developing business strategy, focused primarily on intellectual property and cybercrime prosecution.

Thus, recent efforts to crack down on cybercrime in Southeast Asia seem just as likely to be industrial policy as rule of law. Regardless of the rate of cybercrime, it’s becoming increasingly important for ASEAN economies to look tough on cyber crime to spur high-tech and research based investment in the region.


Jake Lerner

About Jake Lerner

Jake Lerner is in his third year at UC Berkeley, and his fourth semester at the Berkeley APEC Study Center. His double major in Computer Science and Political Science tends to keep him occupied, but he still finds time to play strategy games, read leftist literature, dance, take a leadership role in his living co-operative, and climb the occasional tree. He is from Grass Valley, California.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

What is 7 + 14 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

One thought on “Cybercrime Enforcement: ASEAN’s New Industrial Policy?

  • Colm Barry

    I made an interesting discovery with a website I do SEO for sporadically: apart from several hacking attempts from Chinese and Russian or CIS states (as per IP address), the majority (!) of attempts to log into the system (CMS backend) came from Vietnamese IP addresses. I don’t know if this was just that particular site but if not then certainly ASEAN countries are a hub of illicit cyber behavior.